Craps often feels chaotic because short-term results vary dramatically from long-term expectations. This article explains variance, why outcomes cluster, and why emotion-driven interpretations of wins and losses are misleading.
Each roll of the dice in craps is independent of every previous roll. This article explains what independence means, why streaks do not change probability, and how the gambler’s fallacy fuels belief in table memory.
The casino advantage in craps does not come from the dice or player behavior. This article explains how house edge is built into payout structures, why it is fixed, and why it only reveals itself over long-term play.
Hot shooters, cold tables, and pattern watching are persistent craps myths. This article explains why these beliefs feel convincing, how variance sustains them, and why none of them change how the game actually works.
Craps systems attempt to impose structure on randomness through progressions, patterns, and timing. This article explains why all systems fail mathematically, even when short-term results appear to validate them.
Craps is often misunderstood because of its crowded table and fast pace. This article explains the basic mechanics of the game, how two dice generate outcomes, and why the table’s complexity is visual rather than mathematical.
Dice outcomes in craps are not evenly distributed. This article breaks down two-dice probability, explains why 7 dominates the game, and shows how misunderstanding combinations leads to false expectations and perceived patterns.
Craps is driven by two dice, fixed probabilities, structural house edge, and statistical variance. This guide explains how the game actually works, why outcomes feel unpredictable, and why common myths persist despite clear mathematics.
Physical interaction, social reinforcement, and table complexity make craps feel like a game of skill. This article explains why those impressions arise and why player behavior cannot influence probability or expectation.
